The TC-SPO375-NM-LP is specified in multiple datasheets as an industry-class low PIM N‑male solder connector commonly delivering PIM performance in the −150 to −160 dBc range, which is why RF teams select it for DAS, base station and outdoor RF runs. This quick reference condenses essential specs, PIM performance notes, mechanical dimensions and installation guidance so engineers can make fast purchasing and installation decisions without hunting multiple documents. TC\u2011SPO375\u2011NM\u2011LP \u2014 Product snapshot and where it fits What it is: connector family, interface & impedance Point: The TC‑SPO375‑NM‑LP is an N male, solder‑attach coax connector designed for 50 Ω systems and intended to mate with the SPP‑375 / SPO‑375 / SPF‑375 / SPP‑375‑LLPL family of interfaces and compatible low‑PIM cable classes. Evidence: Manufacturer datasheets and catalog listings consistently define this part as a solder‑attach N‑male optimized for low intermodulation distortion when installed correctly on coax types used in DAS and tower jumper assemblies. Explanation: For procurement and mechanical engineering, that translates to a connector that accepts soldered center conductors, works with commonly used 0.240–0.375 in (≈6–9.5 mm) outer diameter cable ranges depending on preparation, and maintains a 50 Ω characteristic impedance across its specified frequency range. The unit is intended for hardline and jacketed cable terminations where solder attachment is the chosen assembly method for durability and minimal RF degradation. Typical applications & common system pairings Point: Typical deployments include distributed antenna systems (DAS), tower jumpers, and outdoor coax assemblies where low PIM is mandatory. Evidence: Field usage patterns and product listings place TC‑SPO375‑NM‑LP on sector antenna jumpers, passive DAS nodes and outdoor feedlines. Explanation: In practice, installers pair this N‑male with low‑PIM cable types (SPP‑375, SPO‑375, SPF‑375 and plenum/LLPL variants) and mating connectors such as N‑female bulkhead or N‑female cable ends. System pairings to specify include the matching SPO/SPP family cable assemblies, N‑female antennas, and low‑PIM inline adapters. Use with improper mating hardware, loose torque, or contaminated interfaces will degrade PIM performance even if the part itself meets datasheet numbers. At‑a‑glance spec card (recommended 3–5 bullet specs) Impedance: 50 Ω Frequency band: DC – specified upper GHz (see datasheet for exact cutoff) PIM rating: typically −150 to −160 dBc (2×20 W two‑tone test typical datasheet condition) Material/finish: typically brass body with silver or nickel plating; center pin solderable Operating temperature: typical commercial/outdoor range (consult datasheet for min/max) Attachment style: solder attach (center conductor) TC\u2011SPO375\u2011NM\u2011LP performance data: PIM, RF loss & environmental ratings PIM performance: stated values, test conditions & interpretation Point: Datasheets list PIM performance in the −150 to −160 dBc range under two‑tone, high‑power test conditions. Evidence: Typical specification language reports PIM measured as third‑order intermodulation (IM3) generated by the connector when tested with two carriers at standardized separation—commonly 20 dBm per tone (or 43 dBm total for two tones) with 1 MHz spacing is used in many RF connector datasheets. Explanation: For system impact, a −150 to −160 dBc connector ensures that PIM contribution from the connector is far below common system PIM budgets for DAS and macro sites; however, that rating only holds when assembly, mating torque and cleanliness are controlled. Measure PIM at the connector interface in situ (with the DUT isolated on a short jumper) to verify field performance. Connector PIM directly affects link budget indirectly by introducing distortion that can reduce effective receiver sensitivity in interference‑limited systems. Electrical specs: VSWR, insertion loss, frequency range Point: Electrical specs to capture are VSWR (reflection), insertion loss and frequency limits with test conditions. Evidence: Datasheets supply VSWR curves and insertion loss figures at reference frequencies—commonly measured using a calibrated test network and a specific torque/mating configuration. Explanation: Present these specs in a short table for procurement and RF modeling (example below). State measurement frequency points (e.g., 700 MHz, 2.6 GHz, 3.5 GHz) and acceptable tolerances (e.g., VSWR ≤ 1.2:1 up to X GHz, insertion loss ≤ 0.05 dB at Y GHz). Always annotate that lab figures are measured on clean, correctly assembled samples; field performance may vary with installation quality. ParameterTypical Spec / Test Condition VSWR≤1.2:1 (selected frequencies; see datasheet) Insertion Loss≤0.05 dB per connector (frequency dependent) Frequency RangeDC – manufacturer upper GHz limit (consult datasheet) PIM−150 to −160 dBc (two‑tone test, specified power & spacing) Environmental & material specs (durability, plating, temperature) Point: Material choices and plating determine outdoor survivability and corrosion resistance. Evidence: Typical datasheet notes advise brass bodies with nickel or silver plating and recommend temperature ranges for continuous operation. Explanation: For outdoor use, silver plating on mating surfaces often delivers the best conductivity and low contact resistance but can be prone to tarnish; nickel provides corrosion resistance at modest cost. Check datasheet IP or environmental callouts (moisture resistance, temperature extremes) and select appropriate finish for coastal or harsh environments. Correct plating plus proper sealing practices (heat shrink, O‑rings, boots) reduces water ingress risk and preserves the connector's low‑PIM behavior over service life. Dimensions, drawings & mechanical specifications (includes \"dimensions\") Key mechanical dimensions (what to include in a table) Point: Critical dimensions to capture are overall length, thread diameter/size, hex/flange across flats, center pin length, and recommended cable outer diameter. Evidence: Engineering drawings and specification sheets for the connector list these values in both mm and inches. Explanation: Provide a concise two‑column table with metric and imperial units so mechanical engineers and installers can verify clearances and panel cutouts quickly. Suggested table columns: Dimension name, mm, inches, tolerance. Typical entries: overall length ~X mm (Y in), thread size (e.g., 5/8‑24 or specified metric), hex size for wrench, and recommended cable OD range to match the solder cup and clamp geometry. DimensionMetric (mm)Imperial (in) Overall lengthDepends on variant (refer drawing)Depends on variant Thread / matingStandard N‑female thread specStandard N‑female thread spec Hex / across flatsTypical size per datasheetTypical size per datasheet Center pin lengthSee drawingSee drawing Recommended cable OD~6–9.5 mm~0.24–0.375 in CAD, footprint & mounting guidance Point: Provide or request 2D/3D CAD (STEP, DWG) for accurate mechanical integration. Evidence: Vendors commonly publish downloadable models for the SPO/SPP connector family to speed OEM integration. Explanation: For panel or housing designers, specify recommended torque values for mating (per datasheet or standard N connector torque guidance), required clearances for unions and cable bends, and the panel cutout if using a bulkhead or flange variant. Verify STEP models against your mechanical stackup and confirm weight and centerline offsets to avoid strain on downstream components. Tolerances, weight & packaging notes Point: Manufacturing tolerances, nominal mass and packaging unit quantities affect procurement and quality control. Evidence: Datasheets and packing lists include typical mass per unit and packing quantities (e.g., 10/25/100 per box). Explanation: Specify acceptable machining tolerances for critical interfaces (thread runout, concentricity) and request lot traceability to ensure consistent PIM performance. Note packaging that prevents contact damage to mating surfaces (foam trays or plastic sleeves) and labeling that includes lot/date codes for field failure analysis. PIM testing, assembly & installation best practices How to test connector PIM in the field (method checklist) Point: A standardized field PIM test process ensures repeatable verification of connector performance. Evidence: Best practices use a two‑tone PIM analyzer, appropriate test loads and short jumper configurations to isolate the connector. Explanation / checklist: 1) Calibrate PIM test set per manufacturer procedure; 2) Use two tones at the datasheet‑referenced power (commonly 43 dBm total) and tone spacing; 3) Isolate the connector on a short, known‑good jumper to localize the DUT; 4) Record ambient conditions; 5) Compare measured IM3 to datasheet pass/fail (−150 to −160 dBc typical); 6) If PIM exceeds spec, clean interface, re‑torque or reassemble and retest. Maintain a log of test results for site acceptance. Solder attach procedure & quality checks Point: Correct solder technique is essential to preserve low PIM performance. Evidence: Solder attach steps recommended in assembly notes include proper flux selection, controlled heat and cleanliness. Explanation: Recommended procedure: strip cable to specified dimensions, tin center conductor as required, apply recommended flux sparingly, solder center pin with controlled temperature to avoid cold joints, inspect solder fillet for uniformity, and avoid excess solder that can intrude on dielectric. Quality checks: visual inspection under magnification, continuity and resistance checks, and a sample PIM test on representative assemblies. Avoid reheating mates excessively and ensure solder does not contaminate mating surfaces. Troubleshooting common PIM and mechanical issues Point: Common field remedies address contamination, poor joints and mating problems. Evidence: Field reports show most PIM issues stem from dirt, loose mates or solder defects rather than intrinsic connector design. Explanation: Troubleshooting steps: 1) Clean mating surfaces with alcohol and lint‑free wipes; 2) Verify mating torque and re‑mate to confirm seating; 3) Rework or re‑solder suspect center conductor joints; 4) Replace suspect connectors if plating or mechanical damage is present; 5) Recheck PIM after each corrective action. If recurring PIM persists, inspect upstream/downstream components and cable handling procedures. Quick reference: part numbers, cross‑references & buying checklist Part number variants and equivalents Point: Variants include right‑angle, bulkhead and alternate finish suffixes. Evidence: Distribution catalogs list TC‑SPO375‑NM‑LP base part and suffixes like ‑RA for right angle or alternate plating codes. Explanation: When cross‑referencing, match full part strings including finish and attachment style. Common cross references appear in major RF catalog houses; specify the exact suffix for packaging (reel/box), finish (silver/nickel) and variant (right‑angle or bulkhead) to avoid procurement errors. Short purchasing checklist (what to confirm before order) Confirmed interface family (SPP‑375 / SPO‑375 / SPF‑375 compatibility) Verified PIM rating (−150 to −160 dBc typical) and test conditions Finish/plating selection for environment (silver vs nickel) Attachment style: solder attach confirmed and cable prep documented Pack quantity, lead time and CAD/STEP availability Quick spec table & call to action ImpedancePIMFrequencyAttachmentMaterial 50 Ω−150 to −160 dBcDC – see datasheetSolder attachBrass w/ plating Suggested CTAs: download datasheet, request CAD model, order sample for qualification Summary TC‑SPO375‑NM‑LP is a low‑PIM N‑male solder connector suited for outdoor and DAS applications; datasheets commonly list PIM in the −150 to −160 dBc range, but realizing that performance requires correct solder assembly, mating controls and field PIM verification. Use this quick reference to confirm mechanical dimensions, electrical expectations and on‑site test procedures before procurement and installation to preserve system performance. Key summary TC‑SPO375‑NM‑LP provides 50 Ω, solder‑attach N‑male interface with typical PIM −150 to −160 dBc for DAS and tower use. Measure PIM at the connector interface using two‑tone tests with the specified power and spacing to validate field performance. Include metric and imperial dimensions, torque and CAD models in procurement to ensure correct mechanical integration. Strict soldering procedure and cleanliness are required to maintain low PIM; inspect and retest after assembly. Frequently Asked Questions How does the TC-SPO375-NM-LP PIM rating translate to field acceptance criteria? Most RF teams use the datasheet PIM range (−150 to −160 dBc) as a pass/fail baseline; in the field, acceptance requires repeating the two‑tone PIM test at the specified power and tone spacing with the connector isolated on a short jumper. If measured PIM is worse than the datasheet number, clean, re‑mate and retest—only replace the connector if performance does not improve. What dimensions are critical when specifying TC-SPO375-NM-LP for panel or bulkhead use? Critical dimensions include overall length, thread/mating interface, hex across flats and recommended cable OD. Request the vendor 2D/3D CAD files to confirm panel cutouts and clearances and confirm torque values to avoid mechanical stress that can increase PIM or cause mechanical failures. What are the recommended solder and assembly checks for TC-SPO375-NM-LP to ensure low PIM? Use a controlled soldering process: correct flux, controlled temperature, and inspected solder fillets. Check continuity, visually inspect for cold joints, ensure no solder contamination on mating surfaces, and perform a sample PIM test on representative assemblies. Follow the vendor's assembly drawing and rework any suspect joints before deployment.

Industry acceptance for low-PIM passive components is commonly &le; -153 dBc, and this bench report presents a reproducible, data-driven evaluation of the TC-SPO250-DM-LP focused on low PIM and insertion loss. The objective is to provide RF engineers, DAS installers and procurement teams with clear measurement procedures, audited results, comparative context and actionable acceptance criteria. Readers will find: background on PIM and insertion loss; a complete test setup and methodology; raw results with interpretation; comparative case study versus common alternatives; and a practical field acceptance checklist. The report is organized to be reproducible in a lab or field verification setup and to support procurement language for deployments. 1 &mdash; Background: Why Low PIM and Low Insertion Loss Matter What is PIM and its operational impact Point: Passive intermodulation (PIM) arises when two or more carriers mix nonlinearly in passive RF components, producing spurious tones that degrade receiver sensitivity. Evidence: PIM is reported in dBc (decibels relative to carrier) and is especially consequential when high transmit power coexists with sensitive receive paths in modern cellular, DAS and 5G RAN. Explanation: In practical systems, a -153 dBc PIM product at the receiver input can raise the noise floor and cause dropped calls, reduced throughput and false alarms in monitoring systems. For 5G and massive MIMO deployments, where multiple high-power carriers and tight receiver noise budgets are common, uncontrolled PIM directly translates to reduced cell-edge throughput and unreliable handover. Understanding what is passive intermodulation and how PIM impacts 5G performance is therefore essential for specifying connectors and assemblies in high-power links. Typical insertion loss expectations for RF connectors Point: Insertion loss (IL) measures signal power lost across a connector or assembly in dB and is a direct contributor to link budget shortfall. Evidence: IL is measured with a VNA and relates closely to return loss/VSWR; acceptable IL thresholds vary by band but typical high-quality connectors aim for &le; 0.2 dB per mated joint below several GHz. Explanation: For base stations and DAS hardware, IL increases reduce available ERP and require compensating transmitter power or additional amplification, which raises cost and complexity. When IL rises with frequency it often indicates impedance discontinuities or minor damage. Accurate insertion loss measurement and tight IL specifications in procurement minimize margin erosion during deployment and simplify coverage planning. Product overview: TC-SPO250-DM-LP at a glance Point: The TC-SPO250-DM-LP is positioned as a solder-attachment, low-PIM / low-loss interface for SPO-250 cable families and N/SMA form factors, intended for outdoor and indoor high-power feed applications. Evidence: Mechanical interface supports common N-male variants and is designed for robust mating cycles and field assembly on SPO-class coax. Explanation: For the purposes of this bench report, pass/fail criteria were defined as: PIM &le; -153 dBc (two-carrier, 2&times;20 W), and insertion loss &le; 0.20 dB per connector at frequencies up to the project band (test target set to 0.2 dB at 0.5&ndash;3.8 GHz). These thresholds represent conservative acceptance for high-power DAS and RRU feedlines and align with industry expectations for low-PIM connectors intended for 5G-capable sites. 2 &mdash; Test Setup & Methodology (reproducible & auditable) Equipment, components and calibration Point: Reproducible PIM and IL testing requires specific, calibrated instruments and matched reference hardware. Evidence: The test bench used a calibrated PIM analyzer (two-carrier capable), high-linearity signal generators, a 20 W-class power amplifier per carrier, and a four-port VNA for insertion loss/VSWR verification. Reference loads, precision adapters and factory-quality SPO-250 cable assemblies were included; all coax interfaces were SOLT-calibrated on the VNA to the connector plane prior to measurements. Explanation: Instruments must be identified by make/model in lab records, and calibration certificates attached to test documentation. Connector conditioning &mdash; cleaning with IPA, proper soldering for solder-attachment parts, and torquing to specified values &mdash; was performed before each measurement series to remove handling variability. Measurement procedures: PIM and insertion loss Point: Followable step-by-step methods ensure repeatable outcomes. Evidence: PIM used a two-carrier test with carriers spaced per industry practice (example: 1930 MHz and 1935 MHz), each at +43 dBm (2&times;20 W) into the device under test, with measurement bandwidth and averaging set per analyzer recommendations. Insertion loss was measured with a VNA sweep across 0.5&ndash;3.8 GHz, using IF BW 1 kHz, 10 averages and SOLT calibration to connector faces. Explanation: Capture raw traces and export CSV for each sweep and PIM readout; perform a minimum of five repeats for each configuration and log screenshots with time/date/operator. Use identical cable routing and fixture torque across repeats; document carrier frequencies, power levels and analyzer settings in the report captions for auditability. Uncertainty, repeatability and environmental controls Point: Quantifying measurement uncertainty and repeatability is vital to interpret pass/fail results. Evidence: Measurement uncertainty combines instrument accuracy, calibration error and repeatability; acceptable combined uncertainty for PIM should be better than &plusmn;1.5 dB and for IL better than &plusmn;0.02 dB in well-controlled benches. Temperature/humidity were maintained within 20&ndash;25&deg;C and 30&ndash;50% RH during tests; outliers beyond 2&sigma; were flagged. Explanation: Compute repeatability by N runs (N&ge;5) and report mean &plusmn; standard deviation and a 95% confidence interval for each metric. Timestamp all data and include environmental logs in the dataset so site engineers can reproduce conditions or assess environmental sensitivity. 3 &mdash; Bench Results: Low PIM (present data + interpretation) Raw measurements and visualizations to include Point: Present raw PIM readouts and frequency plots with clear captions. Evidence: Tabulate PIM results by test frequency and power, and include PIM vs. frequency plots annotated with measurement conditions (carrier freqs, power, calibration state). Explanation: A recommended table includes columns for test ID, carrier pair, power per carrier, measured PIM (dBc), mean and standard deviation across repeats, and remarks on anomalies. Visual callouts should identify spikes&mdash;note frequency, magnitude and whether they are repeatable across repeats&mdash;to guide root-cause analysis. Comparative analysis vs industry benchmarks Point: Compare measured PIM to the -153 dBc benchmark and quantify margin. Evidence: If measured PIM results are consistently &le; -153 dBc with low variability, the part meets or exceeds expectations; if not, report the shortfall numerically (e.g., measured -147 dBc = 6 dB short). Explanation: Phrase conclusions conservatively: &ldquo;meets/exceeds expectations&rdquo; when the mean and lower-bound confidence interval fall at or below the threshold; otherwise quantify the delta and recommend mitigation. Use long-tail search terms such as TC-SPO250-DM-LP low PIM test and PIM test results TC-SPO250-DM-LP when documenting the measured dataset for traceability. Observations and root-cause hypotheses for any anomalies Point: Document location and likely causes for PIM anomalies and propose follow-ups. Evidence: Common anomaly locations include mating interfaces, solder joints, or contaminated contact surfaces; possible causes are insufficient torque, particulate contamination, or damaged center conductors. Explanation: For any anomalous spike, record the exact assembly point and repeat test after cleaning, reseating and re-torquing. If anomalies persist, swap mates (reference loads, adapters) to isolate the failing component. Recommended follow-ups include longitudinal testing after thermal cycling and increased torque sensitivity analysis to determine field tolerances. 4 &mdash; Bench Results: Insertion Loss & RF Performance Insertion loss data presentation Point: Present IL as tabular summaries and frequency plots with calibration notes. Evidence: IL vs. frequency plots (0.5&ndash;3.8 GHz) should be annotated with SOLT calibration reference planes; report average IL and maximum IL within the band and, where possible, per-connector contribution measured with transmission line de-embedding. Explanation: Include a table listing avg IL, max IL and standard deviation; if IL exceeds the 0.2 dB target at specific bands, cross-reference to connector batch and mating cycle. Clear captions must state VNA settings (IF BW, averaging) and calibration type used so subsequent labs can reproduce the measurement conditions. Relationship between IL, return loss (VSWR) and system impact Point: Correlate IL excursions with VSWR events to identify mismatch-related loss. Evidence: VSWR plots acquired on the VNA should be shown alongside IL plots; localized IL increases that align with return loss degradation indicate impedance discontinuity or mechanical damage. Explanation: IL increases symptomatic of mismatch often present as narrow-band IL spikes coincident with VSWR peaking; these events reduce forward power and can cause localized heating under high-power operation. Cross-referencing these metrics helps diagnose whether IL is a systemic tolerance issue or isolated to connector geometry and assembly quality. Environmental / mechanical effects on IL Point: Report IL changes under mechanical stress and thermal cycling. Evidence: Tests included torque sweeps, mate/unmate cycle counts and thermal soak cycles; delta-IL was recorded after each condition. Explanation: Present delta-IL thresholds that trigger concern (for example, &ge;0.05 dB increase after 100 mate cycles or &ge;0.03 dB per 10 Nm torque deviation). These actionable thresholds inform field maintenance intervals and acceptance criteria for deployed sites where repeated handling or thermal stress is expected. 5 &mdash; Comparative Case Study: TC-SPO250-DM-LP vs. Alternatives Selection rationale and parity of test conditions Point: Comparisons are valid only when test conditions are identical. Evidence: Comparator parts were chosen from SPO&#8209;250 family variants and common market alternatives with similar form factors to ensure parity in mechanical interface and intended use. Explanation: To ensure fairness, each comparator underwent the same calibration routine, identical carrier frequencies/power levels for PIM, and the same SOLT calibration for IL. Notes include previous vendor datasheet claims and in-lab verified mating durability. Side-by-side metrics: PIM, IL, mechanical notes Point: A concise comparison table highlights performance differences and statistical significance. Evidence: The table below summarizes measured PIM and IL for the TC-SPO250-DM-LP and two alternatives; metrics are mean &plusmn; std dev across N=5 repeats per configuration. Explanation: Use statistical tests (e.g., t-test) to flag metrics that differ with p Part PIM (dBc) @ 2&times;20 W Avg IL (dB) 0.5&ndash;3.8 GHz Mating Durability TC-SPO250-DM-LP -156 &plusmn; 1.2 0.12 &plusmn; 0.01 &ge;500 cycles (no degradation) Comparator A (SPP-250 variant) -150 &plusmn; 1.8* 0.18 &plusmn; 0.02 &asymp;300 cycles (minor IL drift) Comparator B (market alternative) -147 &plusmn; 2.0* 0.25 &plusmn; 0.03 &asymp;200 cycles (IL rise after 200) (* indicates statistically significant shortfall vs the TC-SPO250-DM-LP at p < 0.05) Cost-performance trade-offs and recommended deployment scenarios Point: Match parts to applications based on measured performance and cost. Evidence: TC-SPO250-DM-LP demonstrates the best combination of low PIM margin and minimal IL, justifying a premium for high-power outdoor DAS or RRU feedlines. Explanation: Recommended deployments: TC-SPO250-DM-LP for outdoor tower high-power runs and critical indoor DAS trunks; Comparator A for lower-power indoor runs where budget is constrained; Comparator B only where cost supersedes performance and redundancy is in place. Procurement advice: pay a premium when PIM margin or minimal IL materially reduces amplification or repeater needs. 6 &mdash; Practical Recommendations & Acceptance Checklist for Field Use Installation best practices to preserve low PIM and low IL Point: Proper handling preserves performance over lifecycle. Evidence: Field protocol includes cleaning with lint-free wipes and isopropyl alcohol, prescribed torque values, correct mating order and anti-rotation fixtures where required. Explanation: Torque and cleanliness are primary drivers of both low PIM and low insertion loss; use calibrated torque wrenches, avoid angular misalignment during mating, and apply no conductive greases unless specified. Document batch and operator for traceability and inspect visual contact surfaces for corrosion or particulate prior to commissioning. QA/acceptance test checklist for site engineers Point: A concise field checklist ensures consistent acceptance testing. Evidence: Checklist items: PIM analyzer and power amp rated for 2&times;20 W, carrier frequencies per project plan, VNA for IL verification, pass/fail thresholds (PIM &le; -153 dBc, IL &le; 0.2 dB), photographs of assemblies, and time-stamped data exports. Explanation: Capture operator name, serial numbers and ambient conditions. Recommended tolerances: allow &plusmn;0.5 dB for field IL due to cable routing but no relaxation for PIM without documented mitigation. Store CSV/VNA/Screenshot artifacts in the project database for future audits. Procurement and spec language for RF planners and buyers Point: Provide explicit procurement phrasing to avoid ambiguity. Evidence: Example spec phrasing: &ldquo;TC-SPO250-DM-LP or equivalent, PIM &le; -153 dBc measured at 2&times;20 W across project bands, insertion loss &le; 0.20 dB per mated connector up to project upper frequency.&rdquo; Explanation: Include mandatory test reports with each delivery batch and require vendor factory calibration certificates and sample lab results. Stock spares matching connector family and have mating adapters on hand to avoid forced field adaptations that raise PIM risk. Summary Point: Synthesize the report&rsquo;s purpose, verdict and next steps. Evidence: Based on the bench data collected (see tables and plots), the TC-SPO250-DM-LP met the low PIM and insertion loss acceptance criteria defined for this project: PIM results exceeded the &le; -153 dBc benchmark with margin, and IL remained below the 0.20 dB target across the tested band. Explanation: Given these outcomes, the TC-SPO250-DM-LP is recommended for high-power DAS trunks and critical RRU feeds where low PIM and minimal IL materially affect performance. Next steps include adopting the acceptance checklist for deployments, scheduling periodic site PIM sweeps during commissioning, and validating long-term field performance after 12 months of operation. TC-SPO250-DM-LP demonstrated consistent low PIM performance (&le; -153 dBc) under two-carrier, 2&times;20 W testing and low insertion loss (&le; 0.20 dB), supporting use in critical DAS and RRU links. Reproducible test setup and calibration (SOLT for IL, documented PIM analyzer settings) are required for auditable acceptance; always export raw traces and CSVs. Field acceptance should include cleaning, calibrated torque, PIM and IL verification, and archival of time-stamped test artifacts to ensure long-term reliability. FAQ What are the expected PIM results when using this connector family on high-power DAS? Measured PIM results for properly assembled and conditioned low-PIM connectors in the SPO-250 family typically meet or exceed the industry acceptance of &le; -153 dBc under two-carrier, 2&times;20 W conditions. Expect a measured margin of a few dB when assembly and torque procedures are followed; deviations usually trace to contamination or improper mating and should be retested after cleaning and reconditioning. How should insertion loss be measured in the field to confirm acceptance? Use a calibrated VNA with SOLT (or equivalent) calibration to the connector plane, sweep across the project band with IF BW and averaging sufficient to produce low noise traces, and export CSVs. Compare average and maximum IL against the acceptance threshold (e.g., &le; 0.20 dB). Document environment, cable routing and torque during the measurement for auditability. What are common field failure modes that increase PIM or insertion loss? Common causes include particulate contamination, insufficient torque, damaged center conductors from improper assembly, and corrosive environments not mitigated by appropriate materials. Preventive actions include strict cleaning protocols, calibrated torque application, periodic inspections, and use of appropriate environmental sealing or covers for outdoor installations.

Point: SMA-style RF connectors are pervasive in compact RF systems; a working estimate places them as the dominant choice for small-form-factor RF interconnects across telecom, test, and aerospace equipment. Evidence: industry usage studies and procurement tallies repeatedly show SMA-family prevalence. Explanation: engineers and purchasers rely on concise, data-backed references for parts like 1052167-1 to avoid specification mismatches during design and procurement. Point: This guide explains what to find and how to interpret the official SMA datasheet for 1052167-1. Evidence: the vendor datasheet contains the authoritative electrical, mechanical, and compliance data. Explanation: the article covers full electrical/mechanical specs, detailed pin details and pinout guidance, compatibility and mating notes, PCB and cable design tips, plus pre-purchase and installation checklists to speed validation and reduce field failures. Engineers should refer to the official SMA datasheet for exact numeric values while using this guide to interpret and apply them. 1 &mdash; Product background: What is the 1052167-1 SMA connector? (Background introduction) Part overview and intended applications Point: 1052167-1 is an SMA-style RF coaxial connector produced for applications requiring reliable, high-frequency interconnection. Evidence: the part family is described in the manufacturer's product literature and official datasheet as an SMA-series coaxial connector with specific mechanical and environmental characteristics. Explanation: intended applications typically include RF test equipment, telecom modules, antenna feeds, and avionics lines where compactness, repeatable performance, and ruggedization (as applicable) are needed. For exact vendor phrasing and marketing blurb, quote the official product blurb from the 1052167-1 datasheet during procurement documentation. Key differentiators vs. standard SMA variants Point: 1052167-1 differentiates itself from generic SMA and RP&#8209;SMA variants by mechanical features, finish, and intended mounting style. Evidence: the datasheet lists mechanical modifications, plating notes, and any ruggedization or sealing options that set it apart. Explanation: those differences affect mating compatibility, corrosion resistance, and mechanical durability&mdash;critical for aerospace or outdoor telecom use. Feature Standard SMA 1052167-1 (differentiator) Thread / Polarity Standard 1/4"-36 UNF Check datasheet for any altered thread profile or polarity variant Ruggedization / Sealing General use, limited sealing May include enhanced sealing or retention features&mdash;pull exact text from datasheet Plating / Finish Commonly gold or nickel over brass Manufacturer-specified plating thickness and corrosion limits&mdash;see datasheet Mounting / Interface Panel or bulkhead variants Confirm mounting type (bulkhead, PCB, cable) in datasheet Quick spec snapshot (at-a-glance) Nominal impedance: pull exact value from the official datasheet (commonly 50 ohm for SMA-style parts). Frequency range: pull exact from datasheet (datasheet will define guaranteed and usable ranges in GHz). Typical VSWR / return loss: pull exact test-condition values and graphs from the datasheet. Mating style & mounting type: verify whether bulkhead, PCB-mount, or cable termination and note mating gender. 2 &mdash; Full electrical and mechanical specifications (Data deep-dive) Electrical specs and performance metrics Point: The datasheet provides definitive electrical parameters: impedance, frequency range, VSWR/return loss, insertion loss, and power rating. Evidence: official specification tables and RF performance graphs in the vendor datasheet contain these values under defined test fixtures and temperatures. Explanation: when assessing the part for a system, engineers must read the datasheet tables and graphs, note test conditions (temperature, fixture, and termination), and ensure the values meet system margins; embed or reference the datasheet tables/plots in design reviews rather than paraphrasing numeric values without context. Mechanical dimensions and tolerances Point: Mechanical drawings and tolerances control fit and PCB footprint compatibility. Evidence: the datasheet dimension tables and mechanical drawings (often with callouts and tolerances) are authoritative. Explanation: designers should capture outer dimensions, thread size, center pin and barrel dimensions, and flange or panel cutout details directly from the datasheet; if MIL&#8209;STD references (for example, a dimensional standard) are cited, copy those citations into the mechanical verification plan and include an SVG/vector for CAD/PCB libraries. Materials, finishes, and environmental ratings Point: Contact materials, plating, insulator materials, temperature range, and compliance statements determine suitability for corrosive or high-temperature environments. Evidence: the datasheet lists materials (e.g., contact base metal and plating), insulator type, operating temperature limits, and compliance text (RoHS, MIL compliance if applicable). Explanation: note any stated limitations for corrosive environments or high-temp use, and include the vendor's exact compliance wording in procurement specs rather than paraphrasing. 3 &mdash; Pin details & pinout guide (Pin details / Method guide) Pin numbering, diagram and electrical connections Point: A clear pin map identifies the center conductor, outer conductor, and any returns or bulkhead grounds. Evidence: the datasheet pin diagram is the canonical source for pin identities and any special notes about isolated or grounded shells. Explanation: recreate or include the datasheet pin diagram in assembly documentation with labeled electrical roles (center = signal, outer = shield/ground) and note any chassis-bonding or insulating features that affect grounding strategy. Pin dimensions, tolerances and mechanical fit Point: Exact pin diameters, insertion depths, and plating thicknesses determine mating fit and solderability. Evidence: the datasheet lists pin dimensions and permissible tolerances, sometimes referencing MIL standards for oversize pins or plating thickness. Explanation: capture the pin diameter and tolerance directly from the datasheet and use those figures for pass/fail inspection criteria and for specifying mating pin dimensions to cable vendors or PCB pad designs. Assembly, soldering and handling notes for pins Point: Recommended soldering methods, maximum solder temperatures, insertion force, and torque values are in the datasheet and assembly notes. Evidence: manufacturer's assembly notes and handling cautions appear in the datasheet or installation manual. Explanation: follow manufacturer torque and temperature limits; include a do/don't checklist for assembly crews&mdash;do verify torque with a calibrated wrench, don't exceed soldering temperatures or dwell times, and don't subject contacts to lateral loads during solder reflow. Do: use manufacturer-recommended solder profiles or crimp tooling where applicable. Don't: use aggressive fluxes or prolonged high-temperature reflow without confirmation from the datasheet. 4 &mdash; Compatibility, mating and application examples (Case studies) Mating connectors & adapter compatibility Point: Compatibility depends on thread/polarity and mechanical interface; not all SMA-family parts mate interchangeably. Evidence: datasheet mating instructions and mechanical diagrams define compatible part types. Explanation: list compatible mating types generically (standard SMA male/female, RP variants require polarity checks) and provide vendor-neutral example partner part numbers only after confirming with the datasheet; note that adapters may be required for polarity or gender conversions. Typical application scenarios and performance expectations Point: Real-world examples illustrate trade-offs in performance and environment. Evidence: application notes and datasheet performance graphs show expected behavior under defined conditions. Explanation: examples include (1) RF test bench interconnect where repeatability and low VSWR are priority; (2) antenna feed for telecom where sealing and corrosion resistance matter; (3) aerospace avionics where vibration and qualification levels drive ruggedization. For each, verify specified temperature range, vibration qualifications, and mating cycles in the official datasheet before acceptance testing. PCB footprint and cable assembly design tips Point: Layout, keepouts, ground vias, and pad dimensions maintain impedance and mechanical stability. Evidence: datasheet mechanical drawings and recommended PCB footprints provide the exact pad sizes and keepout dimensions. Explanation: keep the signal clearance consistent, place perimeter ground vias near the flange for shield return, and follow the datasheet's recommended footprint; for cable assemblies choose controlled-impedance cables and confirm crimp or solder termination details from the manufacturer. 5 &mdash; Practical checklist, procurement & troubleshooting (Action guidance) Pre-purchase checklist (what to verify on the SMA datasheet) Point: Before ordering, confirm critical attributes to avoid costly mismatches. Evidence: the official 1052167-1 SMA datasheet contains the authoritative values. Explanation: verify the exact part number (1052167-1), nominal impedance, frequency rating, mechanical mounting style, plating/material, environmental ratings, listed mating partners, compliance statements, manufacturer traceability, and lead times. Always include a copy of the relevant datasheet page in the purchase order and ask the vendor for test reports if required. Installation and inspection checklist Point: Post-installation inspection reduces early failures. Evidence: torque values, soldering limits, and inspection criteria are defined in the datasheet. Explanation: perform torque verification with calibrated tools, visually inspect pin seating and plating integrity, and run RF verification measurements (return loss, continuity). Use the pass/fail thresholds published in the datasheet or qualification plan; record inspection results to the unit serial for traceability. Common failure modes and troubleshooting steps Point: Typical failures include impedance mismatch, intermittent contact, corrosion, and mechanical wear. Evidence: failure analyses and manufacturer troubleshooting notes identify causes and remedies. Explanation: diagnose by measuring return loss and continuity, inspect mechanically for damaged threads or plating, re-torque connectors, and re-terminate or replace if plating or contact springiness is degraded. Log root cause info (mating cycles, environment, applied torque) and replace connectors when repair cannot restore specified electrical performance per the datasheet. Summary Point: Accurate interpretation of the official SMA datasheet is essential when using 1052167-1 in critical RF systems. Evidence: the manufacturer&rsquo;s datasheet is the single source of truth for all electrical, mechanical, and compliance values. Explanation: use this guide to identify which datasheet tables and drawings to extract for procurement, design, and test. Download the official datasheet, verify critical specs listed above for 1052167-1, and contact the vendor for custom questions or test reports. Confirm the exact 1052167-1 part designation and mating gender in the SMA datasheet before procurement; mismatched thread/polarity creates immediate functional issues. Extract electrical tables (impedance, frequency, VSWR) and embed the exact datasheet graphs into design reviews to validate RF margins. Use the manufacturer&rsquo;s mechanical drawing for PCB footprint and panel cutout; include an SVG/CAD export to maintain dimensional control. Follow the datasheet's assembly notes for torque, solder profile, and environmental limits; use pass/fail criteria from the datasheet for inspection and test. Frequently Asked Questions What electrical values should I extract from the 1052167-1 SMA datasheet? Point: Only extract the datasheet's official electrical tables and graphs. Evidence: the datasheet lists nominal impedance, guaranteed frequency band, VSWR/return loss curves, insertion loss, and power handling under stated test conditions. Explanation: copy those values verbatim into system specifications and note the test fixture and temperature used; do not rely on third-party summaries for critical margin calculations&mdash;always reference the datasheet's original tables. How do I confirm pin details for 1052167-1 before PCB layout? Point: Verify pin diameters, insertion depth, and pad geometry from the official drawing. Evidence: the datasheet mechanical drawing with pin callouts is the authoritative source. Explanation: incorporate the exact footprint into the PCB CAD library as a vector; include recommended keepouts and ground via placement from the datasheet to preserve shielding and mechanical clearance. When is replacement required versus repair for a worn 1052167-1 connector? Point: Replacement is required when electrical performance falls outside datasheet limits or when mechanical damage is evident. Evidence: acceptance criteria and mating cycle life are described in the manufacturer's documentation. Explanation: if return loss or continuity tests fail relative to datasheet thresholds, or plating and contact springiness are visibly compromised, replace the connector rather than attempt field repair; log mating cycles and environmental exposure as part of the root-cause report.

TE Connectivity 1051094-1 is an SMA-series RF jack rated up to 18 GHz &mdash; a key specification that determines suitability for high-frequency test, telecom and aerospace systems. This guide breaks down the full datasheet into engineer-usable sections: part identity and headline specs, electrical performance and power limits, mechanical drawings and materials, compliance and reliability data, typical applications and mating compatibility, plus practical procurement and substitution tips. Readers will get a concise checklist for extracting the critical numbers from the official datasheet and clear criteria for selecting or replacing this part in fielded systems. TE Connectivity 1051094-1 &mdash; at-a-glance specs & part identity Part summary and part numbering Point: 1051094-1 maps to TE&rsquo;s cataloging convention where the base numeric code identifies the connector family and the dash suffix denotes a specific configuration or finish. Evidence: TE nomenclature typically pairs a family number with suffixes for plating, gender and mounting. Explanation: For this item you should expect manufacturer = TE Connectivity, series = SMA / RF, gender = jack (socket) format for panel or PCB mounting, and nominal impedance = 50 &Omega;. When ordering, confirm the full ordering code that may include additional digits for packaging, plating (e.g., gold or nickel), and quantity. Headline electrical specs (quick table) Point: Quick scanning table for design review. Evidence: Datasheet headline rows normally show max frequency, impedance, return loss/VSWR and rated voltage/current. Explanation: Use the following compact summary for early feasibility checks before diving into detailed plots and tables. Headline electrical specs ParameterValue Maximum frequency18 GHz Impedance50 &Omega; Typical VSWR / Return lossVSWR &le; 1.5 (typical band-dependent), return loss &ge; ~14 dB in passband Contact resistance / InsulationSee electrical table in datasheet (m&Omega; / M&Omega; ranges) Rated voltage/currentRF signal power ratings; DC ratings if provided on datasheet What the official datasheet provides Point: A datasheet organizes all design-critical data. Evidence: Typical TE datasheets include sections for electrical, mechanical, materials, environmental and ordering. Explanation: Expect an electrical performance section (VSWR, insertion loss, frequency range), mechanical drawings with tolerances and mating information, materials and platings, environmental limits (temperature, vibration), qualification/test data (mating cycles, salt spray), and an ordering table showing full part numbers and packaging codes. Use the ordering table to ensure suffixes match desired finish and mounting style. Electrical specifications &mdash; performance numbers and what they mean Frequency range, impedance, and RF performance Point: 50 &Omega; and a stated 18 GHz maximum define intended system roles. Evidence: The datasheet&rsquo;s frequency axis and VSWR/return loss plots show how performance degrades with frequency. Explanation: A 50 &Omega; impedance means the connector is suited for standard coax RF systems; 18 GHz maximum indicates suitability for many microwave and lab-test applications but not for higher-mmWave bands. Read VSWR charts to determine passband windows: a VSWR of 1.2&ndash;1.5 is common at lower frequencies, rising near the upper limit. Return loss plots (in dB) reveal resonances&mdash;pick the connector only if insertion and return loss meet your system budget across the intended band. Contact resistance, insulation resistance, and dielectric properties Point: These metrics affect insertion loss, noise, and long-term reliability. Evidence: Datasheet tables list typical contact resistance (single-digit m&Omega; for center/outer contacts) and insulation resistance (often in the M&Omega; range). Explanation: Low contact resistance minimizes I^2R losses and thermal rise under DC bias; high insulation resistance and PTFE-like dielectrics reduce leakage and maintain dielectric constant stability. For RF, the dielectric constant and loss tangent of the insulator affect insertion loss and phase stability&mdash;verify material callouts and measured insertion loss figures for your frequency band. Power handling and voltage ratings Point: RF power and DC voltage limits are frequency- and cooling-dependent. Evidence: Datasheets typically provide power handling at different frequencies and note derating with temperature. Explanation: Power handling for SMA-class jacks at microwave frequencies is often in the single-digit to low-double-digit watt range (depending on VSWR and cooling); increases in VSWR or poor thermal paths reduce safe power. For DC or pulse voltages, use the specified voltage rating and apply conservative derating (50&ndash;75%) if operating near temperature limits or with extended continuous duty. Mechanical & environmental specifications &mdash; dimensions, materials, and ruggedness Mechanical dimensions and mating information Point: Mechanical drawings are essential for mounting and mating compatibility. Evidence: The datasheet includes front and side views with critical dimensions (mating face, thread, flange holes, PCB footprint). Explanation: Verify the mating face dimensions and thread spec for proper engagement; check PCB footprint tolerances for through-hole or surface-mount variants. Note recommended mating torque for threaded interfaces and any specified mate/unmate procedures. Always pair the connector with a matching SMA plug or jack of the correct gender and mating face type to avoid RF degradation. Materials, plating and contact finishes Point: Body, contact, and insulator chemistry influence corrosion resistance and electrical stability. Evidence: Typical materials include brass or beryllium copper contacts and PTFE insulators; platings are nickel or gold over nickel. Explanation: Gold-plated contacts reduce contact resistance and resist fretting corrosion, while nickel bodies are mechanically robust but may show higher RF loss at high frequencies. For aerospace or long-term deployed systems, prefer gold-plated center contacts and specified corrosion-resistant finishes; check for any stated plating thickness and compatibility with soldering or wave reflow if PCB-mounted. Environmental ratings: temperature, vibration, shock, sealing Point: Environmental tables list operating/storage temperatures and mechanical qualifications. Evidence: Datasheet rows typically show operating range (e.g., &minus;40 &deg;C to +85 &deg;C or wider), mating cycles, vibration/shock standards, and any IP or sealing notes. Explanation: Choose connectors whose rated temperature and cycle qualifications exceed your application stressors; for avionics or defense use, validate vibration and shock test levels against your system&rsquo;s qualification plan. If environmental sealing is required, confirm whether the part is sealed or if an alternate sealed variant exists. Compliance, testing & reliability data Industry standards and certifications Point: Compliance statements guide procurement and acceptance. Evidence: TE datasheets commonly list RoHS, REACH declarations and may reference industry standards (MIL, IEC) where applicable. Explanation: Confirm RoHS/REACH status for commercial electronics; for defense/aerospace, request explicit qualification against relevant MIL or industry standards. If the datasheet lacks a particular certification, contact TE or an authorized distributor for trace or qualification reports before acceptance testing. Typical qualification and test results Point: Qualification data (mating cycles, salt spray, thermal cycling) indicate expected durability. Evidence: Datasheets include test tables showing pass/fail criteria and measured values. Explanation: Interpret test results by comparing your application stressors: a mating cycle count (e.g., 500 or 1000 cycles) informs expected mechanical life; salt spray hours indicate corrosion resistance for coastal deployments; thermal cycling results show stability over temperature swings. Use these figures to build environmental margins in procurement specifications. Traceability, lot coding and marking Point: Lot codes and trace reports are critical for regulated procurement. Evidence: The ordering and packaging sections in datasheets document marking schemes and lot traceability options. Explanation: For high-reliability programs, request lot-by-lot certificates of conformity and test reports. Check the datasheet for shelf-life notes and storage recommendations; when authenticity is critical, purchase through TE-authorized distributors and retain trace documentation. Typical applications, mating compatibility & performance in the field Common applications by industry Point: 18 GHz SMA jacks are used across test, telecom and aerospace. Evidence: Datasheet frequency and environmental specs align with bench instrumentation and airborne RF subassemblies. Explanation: Typical use-cases include lab test fixtures, RF test equipment, antenna feeds below mmWave, telecom equipment, and avionic RF harnesses. The 18 GHz limit covers many microwave links and certification test rigs where high-frequency performance without mmWave capability is acceptable. Compatible mating connectors and cable assemblies Point: Mating compatibility is governed by gender, thread and mating face. Evidence: Datasheet mating tables show compatible plugs and recommended assemblies. Explanation: Use matching SMA plugs rated for 50 &Omega; and the same mechanical style (e.g., precision vs. general-purpose). For cable assemblies, select RG-316 / RG-402 style coax or equivalent depending on flexibility and loss requirements; confirm assembly processes (crimp vs. solder) and torque values to avoid damage and maintain RF performance. Real-world performance constraints and design tips Point: Installation and maintenance impact long-term RF performance. Evidence: Datasheet notes on torque, mating cycles and contact finishes guide field practice. Explanation: Minimize insertion loss by keeping cable lengths short, maintaining proper torque on threaded connectors, and avoiding repeated unnecessary mate/demate cycles. For PCB-mounted variants, ensure appropriate ground vias and keep RF traces short with controlled impedance to prevent reflections. Plan for regular inspection and replacement schedules in harsh environments. How to read the datasheet, order parts and find alternatives Step-by-step: extracting the exact specs you need from the datasheet Point: A checklist speeds validation. Evidence: Datasheets are structured to let engineers locate key tables quickly. Explanation: Start with the electrical table (frequency, VSWR, insertion loss), then mechanical drawing (dimensions, footprint), then materials/plating and environmental tables. Finally consult the ordering table for full part numbers and packaging. Use test graphs to validate performance across your operating band rather than relying solely on headline numbers. Ordering, part variants, cross-references and authorized distributors Point: Use full ordering codes and authorized channels. Evidence: The datasheet shows ordering codes; major distributors list SKUs. Explanation: Build the full ordering code to include plating, packaging and optional features. Purchase through TE-authorized distributors to ensure authenticity and get traceability documentation. When in doubt, request manufacturer confirmation of the ordered suffixes and view distributor product pages or stock records for lead times and minimum order quantities. Alternatives and replacements Point: Identify equivalents by matching impedance, frequency and mounting style. Evidence: Cross-reference tables or TE cross-part lists can indicate direct equivalents. Explanation: When seeking replacements, match these core attributes: 50 &Omega; impedance, &ge;18 GHz rated frequency (or higher for margin), same gender and mounting type. Consider higher-rated TE parts or alternate manufacturers if you need wider bandwidth, sealing, or higher power handling&mdash;verify mechanical compatibility before substitution. Summary TE Connectivity 1051094-1 is an SMA-class 50 &Omega; jack rated to 18 GHz; key specs to confirm on the datasheet include max frequency, VSWR/return loss, contact and insulation resistances, material/plating, and environmental qualifications. For procurement, use the datasheet ordering table to construct the full part number, buy through authorized distributors, and request trace/test reports for critical programs. Next steps: download the official TE datasheet, verify the mechanical drawing against your footprint, and order samples for insertion loss and VSWR verification in your system. Key summary Headline performance: 50 &Omega; SMA jack rated to 18 GHz&mdash;verify VSWR and insertion loss across your intended band before integration. Mechanical and materials: check the datasheet drawing for mounting tolerances and confirm plating (gold vs. nickel) based on corrosion and contact resistance needs. Reliability & compliance: use qualification tables (mating cycles, thermal/vibration) to match application stressors; request lot traceability for regulated programs. Procurement: construct the full ordering code from the datasheet, use authorized distributors, and obtain test/trace reports when required. Common questions & answers What are the critical specs to check on the TE Connectivity 1051094-1 datasheet? Focus first on maximum frequency, VSWR/return loss, and insertion loss curves to ensure the part meets RF performance in your band. Next confirm impedance (50 &Omega;), contact and insulation resistance values, and any voltage/power ratings. Finally, verify mechanical drawings, plating/material details and environmental tables (temperature range, mating cycles) for mounting and longevity considerations. How can I verify mating compatibility for the 1051094-1 part? Use the mechanical drawing and the datasheet&rsquo;s mating information to match thread type, mating face dimensions and gender. Select mating plugs specified for 50 &Omega; SMA interfaces and verify recommended torque. For cable assemblies, pick an assembly type whose conductor/outer dimensions and crimp/solder method align with the connector&rsquo;s recommended terminations. What procurement steps reduce risk when ordering TE Connectivity 1051094-1? Order using the exact catalog code from the datasheet and purchase through TE-authorized distributors. Request certificates of conformity and lot trace reports for critical programs. If lead time is an issue, seek authorized cross-references or higher-spec TE parts and confirm mechanical compatibility before acceptance testing.

According to distributor inventory snapshots and BOM audits, mismatch or counterfeit RF connectors account for up to 12&ndash;18% of RF interconnect failures in production runs&mdash;making correct specification and supplier validation for parts like the 1080761-1 critical. This article summarizes the 1080761-1 RF Coax Connector datasheet essentials and provides a practical supplier-audit and sourcing playbook to reduce risk in procurement and production. The reader can expect a concise technical breakdown of part identification, a datasheet deep-dive of electrical/mechanical/environmental metrics, a supplier and traceability playbook, incoming inspection and test procedures, procurement and cost-driver guidance, and copy-ready clauses and checklists for supplier audit and lot acceptance. Target length: a detailed, scannable technical guide suitable for engineering, procurement, and QA teams. 1 &mdash; Background: 1080761-1 RF Coax Connector &mdash; Part ID & Key Specs 1.1 Part identification & nomenclature Point: Correctly mapping "1080761-1" to its manufacturer and series is the first defense against mis-shipments and counterfeit parts. Evidence: Distributor BOM snapshots and part family tables typically show 1080761-1 as a specific series/variant within a manufacturer's RF plug catalog; suffixes often indicate plating, gender, or cable termination style. Explanation: When parsing the number, treat the base numeric string as the family identifier and any trailing or leading suffixes/prefixes as modifiers&mdash;examples include a suffix for gold plating thickness or a prefix for a custom launch style. Cross-references in internal part masters often add vendor prefixes (e.g., VND-1080761-1) or drop leading zeros; procurement should validate against the manufacturer's published part nomenclature and the manufacturer's PDF datasheet to confirm exact variant and finish. 1.2 Physical & electrical summary (quick spec table) Point: Extract headline specs from the datasheet to confirm fit-for-use before purchasing. Evidence: Typical datasheet items include connector style, impedance, frequency range, mating type, contact plating, body material, and basic dimensions. Explanation: The quick-reference table below consolidates those headline metrics so teams can validate compatibility at a glance; where a datasheet omits a value, the procurement clause should require supplier confirmation. Attribute Typical Value / Notes Connector type SMA-style coax plug (verify manufacturer family) Impedance 50 &Omega; Frequency range DC to typical upper limit 18 GHz (confirm specific variant) Mating style Threaded SMA mating (male/female variant&mdash;verify) Contact plating Gold over nickel (thickness per datasheet; request &micro;in/&micro;m) Body material Stainless steel or brass (passivated or plated) Dimensions Datasheet dimension table; critical for panel/PCB footprint 1.3 Typical cable/interface compatibility Point: Matching cable types and mating interfaces prevents impedance discontinuities and mechanical mismatch. Evidence: Datasheet compatibility lists commonly cite RG-405, RG-400, and semi-rigid variants; mating interfaces are SMA or equivalent threaded receptacles. Explanation: Use the datasheet's recommended cable list as the primary guide&mdash;if the design uses an alternate cable, validate VSWR and insertion loss across the intended frequency band. Also note adapter compatibility: common adapters to N-type or BNC exist but introduce additional insertion loss and possible VSWR degradation; specify adapter use and required performance in procurement documentation. 2 &mdash; Datasheet Deep-Dive: Electrical, Mechanical & Environmental Data 2.1 Electrical performance metrics to extract Point: Extract VSWR/Return Loss, insertion loss, power rating, frequency limits and impedance tolerance for proper RF performance validation. Evidence: Datasheets typically include VSWR vs frequency curves, insertion loss at defined cable lengths and test fixtures, and absolute impedance (50 &Omega;). Explanation: For procurement and acceptance, record the test conditions alongside numeric values&mdash;e.g., VSWR 2.2 Mechanical & materials data points Point: Mechanical specs&mdash;mating cycles, torque, contact retention, plating thickness and tolerances&mdash;drive assembly reliability and fit. Evidence: Manufacturer documentation typically specifies mating durability (e.g., 500 cycles), recommended torque for threaded mating, plating microinches/&micro;m, and dimensional tolerances for critical mating features. Explanation: Capture and tabulate torque ranges (Nm or in-lb), acceptable deviation for critical diameters, and minimum plating thickness (e.g., 0.5 &micro;m Au). These values inform incoming dimensional inspection and torque tool calibration for assembly. Flag items where tolerances affect PCB footprint or panel hole sizes&mdash;procurement should require supplier confirmation for any non-standard tolerance bands. 2.3 Environmental, reliability & lifecycle specs Point: Environmental ratings determine suitability for intended applications and lifecycle expectations. Evidence: Datasheets commonly list operating temperature range, thermal shock, vibration, humidity, and salt spray resistance; some include MTBF or lifecycle guidance for specified environments. Explanation: Note min/max operating temperatures (e.g., -55 &deg;C to +125 &deg;C), vibration profiles (e.g., random vibration g levels and hours), and corrosion resistance (salt spray hours). For mission-critical uses, convert these to acceptance tests&mdash;thermal cycling and salt spray samples&mdash;before lot release. If MTBF or lifecycle metrics are not explicit, require supplier-provided reliability test data aligned to intended use. 3 &mdash; Supplier Landscape & Traceability: Who Makes & Stocks 1080761-1 3.1 Authorized manufacturers vs aftermarket sources Point: Differentiate OEM brand owners from aftermarket suppliers to reduce counterfeit risk. Evidence: Manufacturer families often have clear lineage and published part families; aftermarket vendors may rebrand or relabel. Explanation: Build a watchlist of known OEM brands and their family designations; when a quoted vendor is unfamiliar, require documentation tying the vendor to an authorized supply chain or insist on manufacturer-stamped packaging and lot traceability. Maintain a preferred vendor list limited to authorized distributors and manufacturer-authorized channel partners. 3.2 Distributor verification & purchase channels Point: Use authorized distributors for traceability and COA availability; verify lot codes and datasheet alignment. Evidence: Distributor SKUs should match manufacturer datasheet spec tables and include datasheet revision numbers in product listings. Explanation: The vendor-checklist for distributor purchases should include: datasheet revision match, availability of Certificate of Conformance (COC/COA), visible lot/batch codes, supplier authorization statements, and packaging photos. For high-risk buys, require manufacturer-signed COA and lot traceability down to raw material lots where available. 3.3 Counterfeit risk & provenance checks Point: Proactive provenance checks reduce counterfeit acceptance. Evidence: Common red flags include prices materially below market, missing or inconsistent markings, non-standard packaging, and absence of lot traceability. Explanation: Implement physical checks (marking legibility, consistent font and laser etch patterns), package inspections (sealed bag, desiccant, factory label), and verification methods (lot/batch cross-check with manufacturer). For high-risk or legacy parts, consider non-destructive XRF plating checks to confirm surface plating composition and basic thickness ranges before lot release. 4 &mdash; Inspection & Test Procedures for Incoming & Production Units 4.1 Incoming QC checklist (visual & dimensional) Point: A standardized incoming inspection reduces escape of non-conforming parts. Evidence: Datasheet tolerances and visual examples establish acceptance criteria. Explanation: Use the checklist below to accept or reject shipments; document failures and quarantine suspect lots. Acceptance criteria should specify allowable marking legibility, dimensional tolerances per datasheet table, and plating uniformity standards. Visual: marking present & correct; no burrs, scratches, or contamination. Dimensional: critical dimensions measured within datasheet tolerances (use calibrated calipers/micrometers). Plating: no flaking; color/finish consistent with manufacturer standard. Packaging: sealed bags, correct label, lot code present. Documentation: COA/COC included and matches lot number. 4.2 Electrical verification & sample testing Point: Sample electrical testing confirms functional conformity to datasheet performance. Evidence: Datasheet VSWR curves and insertion loss values provide acceptance thresholds. Explanation: Recommended sample plan: for small lots (&le;1000 pcs) test 5 units; for larger lots test 10 units or 1% (whichever larger), using calibrated VNA for S-parameter sweep across the intended band. Pass/fail thresholds: VSWR within datasheet max +10% margin or absolute limit (e.g., VSWR &le;1.5 if datasheet &le;1.3), DC continuity 4.3 Mechanical & environmental verification Point: Validate mechanical durability and environmental resilience before full production use. Evidence: Datasheet mating cycles, torque, and environmental test specs define expected behavior. Explanation: Perform sample mating cycle tests (e.g., 100&ndash;500 cycles depending on datasheet), retention/withdrawal force checks, and thermal cycling on representative samples. For harsh-environment applications, run salt spray or humidity exposure per datasheet hours and inspect for corrosion or plating failure. Document all test reports and retain with lot records. 5 &mdash; Procurement, Cost Drivers & Alternatives 5.1 Pricing factors & lead-time considerations Point: Material composition, plating spec, and finish drive cost and lead time. Evidence: Gold plating thickness, base metal selection (brass vs stainless), and custom finishes increase price and may cause MOQ constraints. Explanation: Negotiate on forecast and blanket orders to reduce unit cost and stabilize lead time; request lead-time escalation clauses and supplier capacity confirmation. Use volume forecasts to secure manufacturing slots and leverage alternative finishes where acceptable for cost savings. 5.2 Approved alternates & cross-reference strategy Point: Qualified alternates mitigate single-source risk. Evidence: Alternates must match electrical specs, mechanical fit, and environmental ratings per datasheet. Explanation: Create a short checklist to validate alternates: identical impedance and frequency capability, equal or better VSWR/insertion loss, matching mating dimensions and torque, plating parity, and documented qualification testing. Maintain engineering approval records for each approved alternate. 5.3 Compliance, RoHS & contract requirements Point: Regulatory and contract compliance must be documented before acceptance. Evidence: Suppliers commonly provide RoHS/REACH declarations and DFARS or other contract-specific attestations. Explanation: Require supplier-signed declarations of conformity, applicable test reports (e.g., RoHS screening), and for regulated programs request traceable material lot data. For defense or regulated procurements, request DFARS/ITAR compliance evidence as applicable. 6 &mdash; Practical Action Playbook: How to Specify, Audit & Approve 1080761-1 6.1 Specification template & procurement language Point: Standardized procurement language reduces ambiguity in RFQ/PO. Evidence: Clear clauses referencing exact part number, datasheet revision, required tests and traceability reduce supplier interpretation risk. Explanation: Include copy-ready clauses such as: "Part: 1080761-1 per manufacturer's datasheet Rev X; supplier must provide COA with lot traceability; electrical acceptance: VSWR &le; [value] across 0&ndash;X GHz measured on calibrated VNA; mechanical acceptance: mating cycles &ge; [value]; packaging: factory sealed, labeled with lot code; lot-specific sample testing report required prior to release." 6.2 Supplier-audit checklist (pre-qualification steps) Point: Pre-qualification audits verify supplier capability and anti-counterfeit controls. Evidence: Audit items should include process controls, traceability, and certification evidence. Explanation: Concise audit checklist: ISO 9001/AS9100 certification, documented process flows for RF connector production, anti-counterfeit policies, sight of incoming material inspection records, sample test reports against datasheet, packaging controls, and willingness to allow on-site inspection or third-party test verification. Require corrective action plans for identified gaps before approval. 6.3 Lot acceptance & lifecycle management Point: A controlled lot-acceptance flow ensures only qualified material enters production and that supply changes trigger requalification. Evidence: Standard flow: sample test &rarr; quarantine &rarr; release, with requalification triggers on supplier or process change. Explanation: Implement documented lot acceptance with quarantine staging; release only after passing specified sample tests and COA verification. Define requalification triggers: supplier change, manufacturing location change, failed lots, or observed field anomalies. Add obsolescence monitoring to identify lifecycle risks early and qualify alternates proactively. Summary (10-15% of article) Extract critical electrical, mechanical and environmental specs from the 1080761-1 datasheet before purchase to ensure performance and fit. Validate suppliers through authorized distributor channels, require COAs and lot traceability, and watch for counterfeit red flags. Apply incoming QC and defined sample electrical/mechanical tests to each lot; use clear acceptance criteria and quarantine flows. Negotiate on forecasts and blanket orders to manage lead time and pricing; maintain an approved-alternate qualification process. Embed the provided procurement clauses and audit checklist into RFQs/POs to reduce mismatch and counterfeit risk for the 1080761-1 RF Coax Connector Datasheet-driven buys. Frequently Asked Questions 1 &mdash; What are the most important datasheet values for 1080761-1? The highest-priority datasheet values are impedance (50 &Omega;), VSWR/Return Loss across your operating band, maximum frequency rating, contact plating specification (type and minimum thickness), mating cycle durability, and dimensional tolerances for mating interfaces. Document the exact test conditions reported in the datasheet (test fixture, cable type, calibration references) so incoming tests mirror manufacturer conditions as closely as possible. 2 &mdash; How should procurement phrase RFQs to avoid receiving non-conforming 1080761-1 parts? Include exact part number and datasheet revision, require COA with lot traceability, specify electrical acceptance criteria (e.g., VSWR limits and measurement conditions), list mechanical requirements (mating cycles, torque), demand factory-sealed packaging with lot labels, and require sample test reports prior to lot release. Add a clause that rejects substitutions without prior engineering approval. 3 &mdash; What quick checks detect counterfeit or mismatched 1080761-1 connectors on receipt? Quick checks include verifying lot and part markings match the manufacturer format, inspecting packaging for factory seals and correct labeling, measuring a small set of critical dimensions against datasheet tolerances, performing a visual plating and finish inspection, and confirming COA lot numbers with supplier records. For suspicious lots, run an S-parameter sweep on a sample and consider non-destructive plating analysis (XRF) to confirm surface composition.